View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001877T99X171.00 SKB EagleSW Issuepublic2024-02-20 08:24
Reporter(ALTech) Younkwang Jung Assigned To(ALTech) Younkwang Jung Due Date
PrioritynormalSeveritys4-minorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Summary0001877: [Smart3][OS12][Netflix] Request to write a Netflix Security Requirements
DescriptionHi Jason

SKB is asking FXN to fill out the attached document and give feedback

Please update me after you fill it out

Thank you
YK.Jung
TagsNo tags attached.
Attach Tags

Activities

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2024-01-22 08:35

developer  

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2024-01-23 16:40

developer   ~0015000

Hi Jason

SKB netflix manager requested as follows.

After FXN write the Security Review document
Please review directly with Netflix and register with PDM by this week

Thank you
YK.Jung
image.png (19,949 bytes)   
image.png (19,949 bytes)   

(SW) Jason Ling

2024-01-24 16:47

developer   ~0015004

Hi YK,

I've checked it with AML Taiwan.

1. In our other previous project, we didn't do security review.
And we've chosen "Opt out" in security review in this project and submit this result to Netflix. I am not sure if we can change it.

Do you know why SKB want to perform Security Review ?

2. There is a Provisioning description in the document.
As you know, our project launched from ATV9.
At that time, our key manager is unifykey, not provisioning (As far as I know, Intek uses Provisioning)

We/AML don't know how to answer it Provisioning question.
We/AML guess if we said this product don't support Provisioning. Netflix will ask the question, "can we support in-field provisioning"

We've consulted AML Taiwan.
This is a huge task.
We need to upgrade at least 3 version to complete in-field provisioning.
It will affect Netflix's schedule.

Thanks,
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2024-01-24 18:23

developer   ~0015005

Hi Jason

>> Do you know why SKB want to perform Security Review ?
Netflix has asked SKB to register a security review doc.
So SKB requested each manufacturers.

About Provisioning
Like you said, Smart3 started with ATV9.
Please check with AML / netflix if an exemption regarding provisioning is possible.
Or please let me know if there is anything I need to check clearly.

And there are some things that need to be checked about Provisioning.
>> Netflix will ask the question, "can we support in-field provisioning"
>> This is a huge task.
>> We need to upgrade at least 3 version to complete in-field provisioning.
     1) Please explain the 3 versions ( I want to know rough task flow )
     2) if it's risk, let me know that
     3) I want to know if it's practically possible or not

Thank you
YK.Jung

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2024-01-29 08:19

developer   ~0015027

Hi Jason

About Provisioning
If there is anything confirmed with AML or Netflix regarding provisioning
Please let me know.

Currently, SKB is asking that there should be no delay in the Netflix deployment schedule.

Thank you
YK.Jung

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2024-01-29 10:54

developer   ~0015030

Hi Jason

The response I received from SKB netflix manager is as follows.
>> Is there any CAS in the product?
    If so, which CAS?
                Digicap CAS
    Are the devices certified by CAS providers or reviewed by 3rd parties (e.g., Riscure)?
                This device is certified by the Digicap CAS provider.

>> Are there any applications running as root?
     All applications are fully compatible with Android systems and security policies(selinux).

If this answer is not enough, please contact me again

Thank you
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2024-02-07 08:34

developer   ~0015102

HI YK,

We hasn't submitted the document, but we discussed security review topic on PDM with security engineer, then the security review engineer has approved it
Please refer to the attachment.

Thanks,
Jason
comment.png (20,348 bytes)   
comment.png (20,348 bytes)   
security_review_pdm.png (16,540 bytes)   
security_review_pdm.png (16,540 bytes)   

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2024-02-20 08:23

developer   ~0015158

Hi Jason

This ticket is closed because it has been approved
Thank you for your support

YK.Jung

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2024-01-22 08:35 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung New Issue
2024-01-22 08:35 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Status new => assigned
2024-01-22 08:35 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Assigned To => (SW) Jason Ling
2024-01-22 08:35 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung File Added: Meeting Device Security Requirements.docx
2024-01-22 08:36 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Issue Monitored: (ALTech) SY Yoon
2024-01-22 08:36 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Issue Monitored: (ALTech) JunGyu Kim
2024-01-23 16:40 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0015000
2024-01-23 16:40 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung File Added: image.png
2024-01-24 16:44 (SW) Jason Ling Issue Monitored: (SW) Jacky Chiang
2024-01-24 16:44 (SW) Jason Ling Issue Monitored: (SW) Kerwin Chen
2024-01-24 16:47 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0015004
2024-01-24 16:47 (SW) Jason Ling Assigned To (SW) Jason Ling => (ALTech) Younkwang Jung
2024-01-24 18:23 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0015005
2024-01-25 10:21 (SW) Jason Ling Issue Monitored: (PM) Cato Chang
2024-01-25 13:50 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Issue Monitored: (ALTech) Wooshin Kang
2024-01-29 08:19 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0015027
2024-01-29 10:54 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0015030
2024-02-07 08:34 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0015102
2024-02-07 08:34 (SW) Jason Ling File Added: comment.png
2024-02-07 08:34 (SW) Jason Ling File Added: security_review_pdm.png
2024-02-20 08:23 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0015158
2024-02-20 08:24 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Status assigned => closed
2024-02-20 08:24 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Resolution open => fixed